KYC Onboarding Flow

KYC Onboarding Flow

KYC Onboarding Flow

Automating a fragmented, multi-day verification process into one continuous onboarding experience

Automating a fragmented, multi-day verification process into one continuous onboarding experience

Automating a fragmented, multi-day verification process into one continuous onboarding experience

Fintech,

Automated investor onboarding

Product Designer

End-to-end owner

Product, engineering,

compliance, ops

Web, mobile web,

internal CRM

TL;DR

  • Onboarding took 3–7 days across multiple sittings - not a form, a process.

  • 2-4 manual verification gates blocked differents stages, and the same details were collected twice.

  • I reframed it as a gate problem - every gate was somewhere to drop off.

  • Pre-verified data removes both problems at once investors stop typing, ops stop manually checking.

  • Three design calls: persistent progress, form-first layout, honest semantic states.

  • Hardest part was designing for every state, four registry outcomes, four data sources, four user roles.

  • Onboarding took 3–7 days across multiple sittings - not a form, a process.

  • 2-4 manual verification gates blocked differents stages, and the same details were collected twice.

  • I reframed it as a gate problem - every gate was somewhere to drop off.

  • Pre-verified data removes both problems at once investors stop typing, ops stop manually checking.

  • Three design calls: persistent progress, form-first layout, honest semantic states.

  • Hardest part was designing for every state, four registry outcomes, four data sources, four user roles.

OVERVIEW

Alt Invest opens up alternative investments - REITs, InvITs, real estate credit, yield funds to individual investors, at minimums far below the institution-only thresholds these products used to sit behind.


But nobody invests a rupee until they've cleared KYC: mandatory, document-heavy identity verification sitting right at the front of the funnel. Someone who has already decided to invest still has to get through it and if it's painful enough, they don't.

Alt Invest opens up alternative investments - REITs, InvITs, real estate credit, yield funds to individual investors, at minimums far below the institution-only thresholds these products used to sit behind.


But nobody invests a rupee until they've cleared KYC: mandatory, document-heavy identity verification sitting right at the front of the funnel. Someone who has already decided to invest still has to get through it and if it's painful enough, they don't.

who it's for

Retail investors, HNIs, and non-individual entities.

who it's for

Retail investors, HNIs, and non-individual entities.

who it's for

Retail investors, HNIs, and non-individual entities.

who it's for

Regulatory clearance to invest - plus a verified profile ops can trust.

who it's for

Regulatory clearance to invest - plus a verified profile ops can trust.

who it's for

Regulatory clearance to invest - plus a verified profile ops can trust.

who it's for

Compliance rules, third-party data sources, and no room for error.

who it's for

Compliance rules, third-party data sources, and no room for error.

who it's for

Compliance rules, third-party data sources, and no room for error.

Iterated layouts and empty states

THE CHALLENGE

The existing dashboard attempted to serve all users through a single experience and failed to serve any of them well.


Core Problems

  • No hierarchy between strategic insights and operational tasks

  • Managers had to interpret raw metrics to infer action

  • Agents were exposed to analytics they couldn’t act on

  • The structure could not scale to support upcoming AI-driven coaching

The existing dashboard attempted to serve all users through a single experience and failed to serve any of them well.


Core Problems

  • No hierarchy between strategic insights and operational tasks

  • Managers had to interpret raw metrics to infer action

  • Agents were exposed to analytics they couldn’t act on

  • The structure could not scale to support upcoming AI-driven coaching

RESEARCH & STRATEGY

To understand how coaching was currently being used, I worked closely with Product Managers and the Customer Success team who regularly interacted with managers and agents.


The research focused on:

  • How managers tracked coaching progress across teams

  • Where visibility gaps existed in the current dashboard

  • How session types (manual coaching, assessments) were being used

  • What metrics actually influenced performance conversations

  • How permissions and role hierarchies impacted dashboard access


My learnings:

  • Managers needed both a macro view (multi-team performance) and micro insights (rep-level breakdowns) without switching contexts

  • Coaching data was fragmented across views and lacked hierarchy-based clarity

  • The current dashboard did not support trend analysis over time.


Additionally, the introduction of AI Coaching required defining how automated insights would integrate naturally into existing coaching workflows rather than feel like a separate feature.

To understand how coaching was currently being used, I worked closely with Product Managers and the Customer Success team who regularly interacted with managers and agents.


The research focused on:

  • How managers tracked coaching progress across teams

  • Where visibility gaps existed in the current dashboard

  • How session types (manual coaching, assessments) were being used

  • What metrics actually influenced performance conversations

  • How permissions and role hierarchies impacted dashboard access


My learnings:

  • Managers needed both a macro view (multi-team performance) and micro insights (rep-level breakdowns) without switching contexts

  • Coaching data was fragmented across views and lacked hierarchy-based clarity

  • The current dashboard did not support trend analysis over time.


Additionally, the introduction of AI Coaching required defining how automated insights would integrate naturally into existing coaching workflows rather than feel like a separate feature.

PROCESS & EXPLORATION

The strategy centered around three principles:

1. Hierarchy-Based Architecture
Design a layered dashboard system — Multi-Team, Team, and Rep — aligned with organizational structures and decision-making levels.


2. Structured Performance Visibility
Standardize metrics (completion %, overdue logic, assessment scores) to create a consistent and measurable coaching framework.


3. Integrated AI Insights
Embed AI-driven parameter analysis within the dashboard flow so that automated insights enhance — not complicate — managerial oversight.


The goal was to transform coaching from a reactive task into a measurable, trackable performance system.

The strategy centered around three principles:

1. Hierarchy-Based Architecture
Design a layered dashboard system — Multi-Team, Team, and Rep — aligned with organizational structures and decision-making levels.


2. Structured Performance Visibility
Standardize metrics (completion %, overdue logic, assessment scores) to create a consistent and measurable coaching framework.


3. Integrated AI Insights
Embed AI-driven parameter analysis within the dashboard flow so that automated insights enhance — not complicate — managerial oversight.


The goal was to transform coaching from a reactive task into a measurable, trackable performance system.

Existing Coaching Dashboard Design

1

1

The dashboard lacked segmentation across user roles, presenting the same view regardless of user profile.

The dashboard lacked segmentation across user roles, presenting the same view regardless of user profile.

2

2

Filter Placement Feels Detached. Filters were limited and poorly placed, missing key controls like session type and agent status.

Filter Placement Feels Detached. Filters were limited and poorly placed, missing key controls like session type and agent status.

3

3

The dashboard lacked strong, action-oriented CTAs for managers, with limited pathways to drill deeper into performance trends or investigate specific issues.

The dashboard lacked strong, action-oriented CTAs for managers, with limited pathways to drill deeper into performance trends or investigate specific issues.

4

4

The leaderboard is data heavy displaying eight metrics per row, increasing cognitive load and reducing scannability.

The leaderboard is data heavy displaying eight metrics per row, increasing cognitive load and reducing scannability.

5

5

The color system lacked semantic consistency, making visual cues feel decorative rather than functional.

There was no clear visual hierarchy, with headers, filters, stats, and leaderboard competing for attention.

The color system lacked semantic consistency, making visual cues feel decorative rather than functional.

There was no clear visual hierarchy, with headers, filters, stats, and leaderboard competing for attention.

Existing Coaching Dashboard Design

1

The dashboard lacked segmentation across user roles, presenting the same view regardless of user profile.

2

Filter Placement Feels Detached. Filters were limited and poorly placed, missing key controls like session type and agent status.

3

The dashboard lacked strong, action-oriented CTAs for managers, with limited pathways to drill deeper into performance trends or investigate specific issues.

4

The leaderboard is data heavy displaying eight metrics per row, increasing cognitive load and reducing scannability.

5

The color system lacked semantic consistency, making visual cues feel decorative rather than functional.

There was no clear visual hierarchy, with headers, filters, stats, and leaderboard competing for attention.

1

There is no manner to filter out the assigned session, session types, teams etc.

Also, repetitive, text-heavy rows reduce scannability and create scroll fatigue, especially when session titles are similar.

2

The interface lacks clear visual hierarchy, making it difficult to distinguish primary information from supporting details. Important managerial actions are hidden within secondary menus, reducing discoverability and workflow efficiency.

3

Key performance indicators, such as completion percentage, lack strong visual emphasis and urgency signaling. The layout feels like a static session log rather than a prioritized, action-oriented performance management tool.

1

There is no manner to filter out the assigned session, session types, teams etc.

Also, repetitive, text-heavy rows reduce scannability and create scroll fatigue, especially when session titles are similar.

2

The interface lacks clear visual hierarchy, making it difficult to distinguish primary information from supporting details. Important managerial actions are hidden within secondary menus, reducing discoverability and workflow efficiency.

3

Key performance indicators, such as completion percentage, lack strong visual emphasis and urgency signaling. The layout feels like a static session log rather than a prioritized, action-oriented performance management tool.

THE SOLUTION

Replaced the flat dashboard with a three-level system, aligning information depth with user responsibility.


Dashboard Pillars

  1. Stats – Strategic insights

  2. Assigned Sessions – Operational control

  3. My Tasks – Individual execution

Replaced the flat dashboard with a three-level system, aligning information depth with user responsibility.


Dashboard Pillars

  1. Stats – Strategic insights

  2. Assigned Sessions – Operational control

  3. My Tasks – Individual execution

Coaching Dashboard 2.0

My Tasks: AI Coaching sessions

DESIGN BREAKDOWN

Multi-Team & Team Insights

  • Designed for Directors and Managers to detect patterns quickly.

  • Global filters (Team, Rep, Date, Status) update all views dynamically

  • Aggregated AI-flagged parameters surface recurring skill gaps

  • Dual-metric leaderboards allow ranking by Completion % or Assessment Score

Multi-Team & Team Insights

  • Designed for Directors and Managers to detect patterns quickly.

  • Global filters (Team, Rep, Date, Status) update all views dynamically

  • Aggregated AI-flagged parameters surface recurring skill gaps

  • Dual-metric leaderboards allow ranking by Completion % or Assessment Score

2. Assigned Sessions (Management Hub)

  • A centralized command center for Team Leads.

  • Clear separation between “Assigned by Me” and “Assigned by All”

  • Drill-down analytics showing completion states across teams

  • Reduced dependency on manual follow-ups

2. Assigned Sessions (Management Hub)

  • A centralized command center for Team Leads.

  • Clear separation between “Assigned by Me” and “Assigned by All”

  • Drill-down analytics showing completion states across teams

  • Reduced dependency on manual follow-ups

3. My Tasks (Agent Experience)

  • Designed as a focus mode, not a dashboard.

  • Active: In-progress and new sessions prioritized

  • Overdue: High-visibility alerts without notification fatigue

  • Completed: A record of reviewed feedback and progress

Agents always know what to do next nothing more, nothing less.

3. My Tasks (Agent Experience)

  • Designed as a focus mode, not a dashboard.

  • Active: In-progress and new sessions prioritized

  • Overdue: High-visibility alerts without notification fatigue

  • Completed: A record of reviewed feedback and progress

Agents always know what to do next nothing more, nothing less.

Assigned Session Tab

Detailed team level performance view of a single coaching session

IMPACT

Adoption & Usage

  • Actively used by clients such as Traya, Khatabook, Housing, and AVFL

  • Managers regularly rely on the dashboard to track performance and assign assessments

  • Became the primary surface for coaching-related decisions


Engagement & Effectiveness

  • 70%+ assessment completion rate post-revamp

  • Higher follow-through due to clearer task prioritization


Qualitative Signals

  • CSMs reported significantly reduced time spent identifying underperforming agents

  • Faster “time to insight” during reviews

Adoption & Usage

  • Actively used by clients such as Traya, Khatabook, Housing, and AVFL

  • Managers regularly rely on the dashboard to track performance and assign assessments

  • Became the primary surface for coaching-related decisions


Engagement & Effectiveness

  • 70%+ assessment completion rate post-revamp

  • Higher follow-through due to clearer task prioritization


Qualitative Signals

  • CSMs reported significantly reduced time spent identifying underperforming agents

  • Faster “time to insight” during reviews

project type

B2B SaaS | AI powered Coaching & Assessments

my role

Product Designer

Company

Convin

Other Projects

Convin Design System

Component Library, Style Guide & Tokens

Voice AI Widget

Interactive Web Widget

Interactive Web Widget

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.